Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Pregnant women frequently exhibit varied behaviors, such as having a lot of questions, showing insecurity, and fear. Objective: Pregnant women frequently exhibit varied behaviors, such as having a lot of questions, showing insecurity, and fear. As a result, their sensitivity and susceptibility to social expectations surrounding their capacity to breastfeed are increased. This study aims to assess the different knowledge and skills of breastfeeding counseling (BC) on health personnel, and to assess differences in intent, knowledge, prenatal self-efficacy, and prenatal professional support in third-trimester pregnant women. Methods: The study was randomized by applying a pre-test and post-test design in the health worker group and the post-test only control group in the group of pregnant women. A comparative test was done by comparing the intervention indicator between the treatment group and control group using t-test, one-way ANOVA, post hoc test, and chi-square test at a 95% significance level (p < 0.05). Results: There was a difference in the mean score of EBF knowledge, 26.85 95% CI (19.94–33.76) and BC skills, 13.17 95% CI (25.85–36.48) health workers at post-test and pre-test. The comparison of intergroup relations between pregnant women group with EBF intention in Group A, OR 6.83 95% CI (4.10–11.36), and in Group B, OR 1.86 95% CI (1.15–3.01), to the control group. Conclusion: There is a difference in intention, mean breastfeeding knowledge score, prenatal self-efficacy, and support of prenatal breastfeeding preparation between groups of third-trimester pregnant women.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
2. Wen LM, Baur LA, Rissel C, Alperstein G, Simpson JM. Intention to breastfeed and awareness of health recommendations: findings from first-time mothers in southwest Sydney, Australia. Int Breast-feed J. 2009;4:9.
3. DiGirolamo AM, Grummer-Strawn LM, Fein SB. Do perceived attitudes of physi-cians and hospital staff affect breastfeed-ing decisions?. Birth. 2003;30(2):94-100.
4. Guise JM, Palda V, Westhoff C, Chan BK, Helfand M, Lieu TA; U.S. Preventive Ser-vices Task Force. The effectiveness of primary care-based interventions to pro-mote breastfeeding: systematic evidence review and meta-analysis for the US Pre-ventive Services Task Force. Ann Fam Med. 2003;1(2):70-8.
5. Damstra KM. Improving breastfeeding knowledge, self-efficacy and intent through a prenatal education program [dissertations]. US: Grand Valley State University; 2012.
6. Meedya S, Fahy K, Kable A. Factors that positively influence breastfeeding dura-tion to 6 months: a literature review. Women Birth. 2010;23(4):135-45
7. Campbell J, Matoff-Stepp S, Velez ML, Cox HH, Laughon K. Pregnancy-associated deaths from homicide, suicide, and drug overdose: review of research and the in-tersection with intimate partner violence. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021;30(2):236-244.
8. World Health Organization. Infant and young child feeding counselling: an inte-grated course, guidelines for follow-up af-ter training. USA: WHO; 2006.
9. Kramer MS, Chalmers B, Hodnett ED, Sev-kovskaya Z, Dzikovich I, Shapiro S, et al. Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT): a randomized trial in the Republic of Belarus. JAMA. 2001;285(4):413-20.
10. Cattaneo A, Buzzetti R. Effect on rates of breast feeding of training for the baby friendly hospital initiative. BMJ. 2001;323(7325):1358-62.
11. Balogun OO, O'Sullivan EJ, McFadden A, Ota E, Gavine A, Garner CD, et al. Interven-tions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11(11):CD001688.